I've heard people say that the friendships we have in SL are just as "real" as those we have in RL, which is why RL is a misnomer, since SL is every bit as "real" as "real life". The latest such comment came from Athanasius who responded to my previous post:
The people I meet in-world are every bit as real as the people I meet face-to-face (well, except the bots, and they're probably about as "real" as my Roomba). It sits uncomfortably with me to treat those friendships, contracts, promises, agreements, etc. as a lesser priority just because of the location in which, or the means through which, they take place.
This reminded me of a conversation
Dandellion and I once had about falling in love in SL. Who falls in love -- my avatar? But how can my avatar, a bunch of pixels, fall in love all on her own? So it must be the human behind the avatar who has fallen in love. And whom have I fallen in love with? The other avatar? But again, how could I possibly fall in love with a bunch of pixels? So I must have fallen in love with the human behind the avatar.
Of course, then comes all the complications like what if the other person is pretending to be someone they're not, or lying about themselves, and so on. But basically, it's me, the "real" person, who falls in love with the other "real" person.
You see, the avatar itself has no identity. I rez in SL and there is my avatar, standing there, looking pretty. Who is she? Where is she from? What does she want? There are no answers to these questions. She simply... is. When I meet people inworld and they ask me, "What do you do?" I have nothing much to say except, "Hunt freebies, shop, hang out with friends, and... very very occasionally... build." It makes me sound like an aimless dilettante.
But there is so much more to me than that, because I am more than the sum of my avatar. In SL there is nothing to give our avatars true identity. In RL there is a whole body of information about us to offer context, background, a place from which one might begin to understand how a person ticks or what this person is like. Meeting for the first time, one of the first things we talk about is career or job because that's our chosen field, the thing we spend most of our waking hours on, the thing which consumes a lot of our energy and thoughts. We also talk about where we're from, geographically, and, if we have a family, often they -- the people closest to us -- will be mentioned as well.
Then we progress to deeper things: hopes and dreams, struggles and pain, fears and doubts, triumphs and failures, joys and sorrows. That's when the connection to the inner person is forged. Because this is what I'm all about, this is who I am, this is what drives me. You can't fully know another person, perhaps, but you can get close.
Without this kind of closeness, I don't consider it true friendship, more like mere acquaintances. Like the colleagues I have in the office, with whom I talk about work but very little else; I don't know what's going on in their lives, and they don't know what's going on in mine. When we part, it's like we're completely out of each other's consciousness, because the only thing drawing us together is the fact that we share the same office.
Likewise, if I meet you in SL, we've got to have more drawing us together than the fact that we both like to shop, script, build, or explore. If you are friends with me in SL, you're not friends with my avatar, you're friends with
me, the human behind the avatar. Which also means you have to know me; that is, you have to know the human behind the avatar. (And vice-versa, of course.) Otherwise it's a very superficial sort of friendship... what is there to talk about? The millions of hunts in SL? The latest sale? Where to get the prettiest lingerie? Who makes the best hair? Which lucky chair is worth stalking?
So although I agree that the friendships we make in SL are just as "real" as the physical friendships we have with people in RL, the thing is,
these friendships can't be "real" unless you let "real life" in. That's why I contend that "real life" is still "real", not just "first".